Legal Opinion

K. M. Young & Associates, Inc. v. Cieslik

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1983No. CIVIL NO. 5087; CIVIL NO. 5148; NO. 8505PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HEEN, J.

Defendant in intervention Manfred Cieslik (Cieslik) appeals from the summary judgment of the court below in favor of plaintiffs in intervention Ronald Eugene Lanet (Lanet), Everett Franklin Shrewsbury, Pherne Craig Shrews-bury (Shrewsbury) and John Dickmeyer (Dickmeyer) (hereinafter collectively referred to as Intervenors). Cieslik raises the following issues on appeal:(1) Whether the trial court erred in awarding summary judgment; and(2) Whether the trial court erred in denying Cieslik’s motion for reconsideration.

We answer no to both questions. However, for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Frito-Lay of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. CañasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
  3. Jenkins v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lau v. BautistaHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Survivors of Wallace Medeiros v. Maui Land & Pineapple Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bank of Hawaii v. KunimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gossinger v. Association of Apartment Owners of the RegencyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Reed v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API