Legal Opinion

Turner v. Plottel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 1932No. 21753PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. In an action of bail-trover, the petition must contain sueli a description of the property as to make it capable of identification and seizure. McElhannon v. Farmers Alliance Warehouse Co., 95 Ga. 670 (22 S. E. 686) ; McLennan v. Livingston, 108 Ga. 342 (33 S. E. 974) ; Collins v. West, 5 Ga. App. 429 (63 S. E. 540).

2. A description of the property as an “assortment of raincoats,” followed by a list of 23 coats, each of a different lot number and each of a “price” stated, was a compliance with the foregoing rule. Farmers Alliance Warehouse Co. v. McElhannon, 98 Ga. 394 (25 S. E. 558) ;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Davis v. Muscogee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Selma, Rome & Dalton Railroad v. LaceySupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. McElhannon v. Farmers Alliance Warehouse & Commission Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Shepherd v. Southern Pine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Rollins v. Personal Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Johnson Lumber Co. v. Akers Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Readdick v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Brooks v. Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API