Brooks v. Hartsfield Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
1. Assuming that in a petition in a suit in trover a description of the property is insufficient in so far as it is described merely as “one oak dressing-table, one walnut chest of drawers, one floor lamp,” etc., yet where in the petition as amended the property is further described as property which was described in a bill of sale executed by the defendants to the plaintiff on a designated date and recorded on a particular page in a designated record book of the county, and which on the date of the execution of the bill of sale was located in a particularly described house which was the home…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garrett v. Atlanta Home UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Warnell v. PonderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Turner v. PlottelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Boss v. Ed & Al Matthews Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Peterson v. Vidalia Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Millhollan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- NORTH AMERICAN LOAN & THRIFT CO. NO. 2. v. BurelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954