Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Hartsfield Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1937No. 26080PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

1. Assuming that in a petition in a suit in trover a description of the property is insufficient in so far as it is described merely as “one oak dressing-table, one walnut chest of drawers, one floor lamp,” etc., yet where in the petition as amended the property is further described as property which was described in a bill of sale executed by the defendants to the plaintiff on a designated date and recorded on a particular page in a designated record book of the county, and which on the date of the execution of the bill of sale was located in a particularly described house which was the home…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Atlanta Home UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Warnell v. PonderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Turner v. PlottelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Boss v. Ed & Al Matthews Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Peterson v. Vidalia Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Millhollan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  2. NORTH AMERICAN LOAN & THRIFT CO. NO. 2. v. BurelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API