Legal Opinion

Readdick v. Forsythe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 28, 1935No. 24935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. A bill of exceptions may be amended in the appellate court, in order to correct “any imperfection or omission of necessary and proper allegations,” if these can be corrected “from the record in the case” (Code of 1933, § 6-1309), and “so as to conform to the record in the cause” ('§ 6-1401). Omissions from the “record” as transmitted by the clerk of the trial court may be supplied where justice requires (§ 6-1403). Otherwise, “the control of the judge over the bill of exceptions terminates when he has signed and certified it;” and a supplemental certificate signed by the judge, after…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Ponder v. GinnerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Robinson v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Grant v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Cartledge v. AshfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allied Store Utilities Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Borden v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Green Hotels, Inc. v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Gunn v. Airbank of America Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API