Legal Opinion
Harrell v. Parker
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 24, 1938No. 12381PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The fact that the plaintiff amended her petition by striking the equitable features and converting it into an action at law for damages has provoked some thought as to whether we should retain jurisdiction or transmit the case to the Court of Appeals. We have concluded that the writ of error was properly made returnable to this court. The following cases and others which might be mentioned, bearing some resemblance, were transferred: Coats v. Casey, 162 Ga. 236 (133 S. E. 237); Byre v. Piha, 169 Ga. 115 (149 S. E. 699); Collier v. Barnesville,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- DeLacy v. Hurst, Purnell & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Jenkins v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Maxwell v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Deck v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Owen v. S. P. Richards Paper Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Schneider v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Kidd v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.