Legal Opinion

McElhannon v. Farmers Alliance Warehouse & Commission Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1895PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Bail-trover. Before Judge Cobb. City court of Clarke county. March term, 1894.

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

This was a suit for the recovery of personal property under the form of action prescribed by section 3390 of the code. The action provided for by this section of the code combines some of the characteristics of both the old common law actions of trover and detinue, and may be made the basis for the recovery, either of damages • as for a conversion, or for the recovery of a particular chattel alleged to be detained. At common law the action of trover was not designed for the recovery of the specific chattel, but was designed as an action for the recovery of damages for the…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Georgia & Alabama RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Decatur Auto Center, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Small v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Cooke v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Farmers Alliance Warehouse & Commission Co. v. McElhannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API