Wilson v. . Ervin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
We shall first consider the defendant’s appeal.
The trial below was conducted upon the theory that since the real property had been held by the plaintiff and the defendant’s intestate as tenants by the entirety, the proceeds derived from the sale thereof, if such proceeds were held by defendant’s intestate at the time of his death, passed to his administrator, as a part of the estate, and are held in trust for the survivor, his wife. In this there was error.
An estate by entirety in personal property is not recognized in tbis State. Turlington v. Lucas, 186 N. C., 283, 199 S. E., 366; Davis v.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Turlington v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- McKinnon, Currie & Co. v. CaulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Taylor v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Boyd v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Foster v. Englewood Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Lovell v. Rowan Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Bowling v. BowlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Davis v. VaughnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.