Legal Opinion

Wilson v. . Ervin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1947PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

We shall first consider the defendant’s appeal.

The trial below was conducted upon the theory that since the real property had been held by the plaintiff and the defendant’s intestate as tenants by the entirety, the proceeds derived from the sale thereof, if such proceeds were held by defendant’s intestate at the time of his death, passed to his administrator, as a part of the estate, and are held in trust for the survivor, his wife. In this there was error.

An estate by entirety in personal property is not recognized in tbis State. Turlington v. Lucas, 186 N. C., 283, 199 S. E., 366; Davis v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Turlington v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. McKinnon, Currie & Co. v. CaulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Taylor v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Boyd v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Foster v. Englewood Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Lovell v. Rowan Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Bowling v. BowlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Davis v. VaughnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API