Crumpton v. Crumpton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
Appellants took their appeal to this Court claiming that the judgment of the superior court deprived them of property without Due Process of Law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and in violation of the Law of the Land provision of Article I § 19 of the North Carolina Constitution. This appeal is dismissed. The interest of the appellants is still contingent, Strickland v. Jackson, 259 N.C. 81, 130 S.E. 2d 22 (1963). If appellants are ultimately denied an interest in this property by operation of the statutes relied upon by the Court of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peele v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Pendleton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Wikel v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Dawson v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crumpton v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Stoney v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Cheshire v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- In re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust Recorded in Book 911Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980