Legal Opinion
State v. Kievman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 11, 1933PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
By demurrer, which was overruled, and on the trial the defendant asserted that the statute upon which he was prosecuted violated his rights under the Federal and State constitutions, and his appeal presents the same contentions. The statutory provisions to which the information in this case directly relates are contained in Chapter 171, Cum. Sup. 1931. Section 453a defines motor vehicle junk business or motor vehicle junk yard as including “any business and any place of storage or deposit . . . which displays, or in or upon which there are displayed, to view from a public highway,' two or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.