Legal Opinion

State v. Moon

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 16, 2004No. 21444-3-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1

Brown, J.

— George R. Moon was charged with first degree rape and first degree burglary. A jury found Mr. Moon guilty solely of the burglary. At sentencing, the court imposed $5,750 in lab fees for DNA (deoxyribonu-cleic acid) testing against Mr. Moon. Mr. Moon contends the court erred in imposing these fees because he was acquitted of the rape charge. Mr. Moon asks us to interpret RCW 43.43.690 as meaning he must be “adjudged guilty” of the particular crime for the statute to apply. At oral argument, the State conceded the inapplicability of RCW 43.43.690, but argued other general statutes *192…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. State v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State Of Washington v. Kristina CawyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. HardtkeWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. HardtkeWashington Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API