Legal Opinion
State v. Thompson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 2004No. 72997-2PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
92 P.3d 228 (2004)
151 Wash.2d 793
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
James Ross THOMPSON, Petitioner.
No. 72997-2.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued June 10, 2003.
Decided June 24, 2004.
Rita Joan Griffith, Seattle, for Petitioner.
Kathleen Proctor, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorneys Office, Tacoma, for Respondent.
BRIDGE, J.
James Ross Thompson seeks review of his conviction for unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance. Thompson asks this court to review three issues: (1) whether police could forcibly enter his home to execute a civil arrest warrant; (2) whether the "community…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 2005
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.