Legal Opinion
State v. Hardtke
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 2015No. 90812-5Published
1Opinion of the Court
FILE' IN CLERICI OPPICI " lNI_..,wastfledfor~ at @:ooo..I'VI, on .:~oe l\.1<tti. c.,.;~·~ilr~d-i '\}\/" ~ :;:...-- "' WI! • · .- • ~..,,,.,. .. ·vl:'i!· ·· '"'""'·'I"J' . .•..•. .._.,.~~ IN Tlf 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 90812-5 Respondent, ) ) v. ) EnBanc ) FREDERICK ELDEN HARDTKE, ) ) Petitioner. ) ) Filed .JUN 1 1 2015 JOHNSON, J.-This case involves whether a trial court has the authority under RCW 10. 01.160 or CrR 3.2 to impose the cost of pretrial electronic alcohol monitoring. Freder.ick Hardtke was charged with two counts of second degree…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical Center, PSWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Utter v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Utter v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOC. & HEALTH SER.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.