Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2004No. 72997-2PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

James Ross Thompson seeks review of his conviction for unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance. Thompson asks this court to review three issues: (1) whether police could forcibly enter his home to execute a civil arrest warrant; (2) whether the “community care-taking function” allowed police to enter his home when there was no reason to believe someone was in danger or presented danger in the home; and (3) whether police were required to obtain his consent before searching the boathouse on the property. We conclude that when serving a civil arrest warrant, police may not forcibly enter…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 2005

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API