Legal Opinion

State v. Barnes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2003No. 57429-4, 57453-7, 57472-3PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

This is a consolidated review of three criminal cases. Each defendant received a sentence exceeding the standard range under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), RCW 9.94A. The trial court listed future dangerousness as an aggravating factor justifying the exceptional sentence in each case. In State v. Pryor, 115 Wn.2d 445, 799 P.2d 244 (1990), we held future dangerousness may be considered as an aggravating factor justifying an exceptional sentence in sexual offense cases. Here, we are asked to extend future dangerousness to nonsexual offense cases. We decline to do so and hold future…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. PostWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. StraussWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API