Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Schumacher

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1949No. Civ. 13947PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an action by a contractor for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. Plaintiff contracted to erect a market building on land owned by defendant. All of the defendants named as having some right, title or interest in the premises appeal from the judgment in favor of plaintiff.

The complaint alleges a verbal contract to erect the building ; that all materials were furnished and the labor performed between January and December, 1946, at the request of Harry C. Schumacher; that the reasonable value of the materials and labor agreed to be paid is $39,858.85; that $30,000 of this amount has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Anselmo v. SebastianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Lohn v. Fletcher Oil Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Cincotta v. CataniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Fanucchi & Limi Farms v. United Agri ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. J. A. Folger & Co. v. WilliamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Preszler v. DudleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Flynn v. Sun Life Assurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API