Legal Opinion
Krepps v. Reiner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 24, 2008No. 07 Civ. 9884PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Insead (“Insead”) and In-sead North America (“INA”) (collectively, the “Corporate Defendants”) have moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(h), 12(b)(l-3), and 12(b)(5-6) to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) of plaintiff pro se, Matthew B. Krepps (“Krepps” or the “Plaintiff’). Defendant Michael C. Miller (“Miller”) has moved separately to dismiss the claims asserted against him pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Upon the conclusions set forth below, the motions are granted.
Krepps, a former professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Biro v. Condé NastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Lan Sang v. Ming HaiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Lesesne v. BrimecomeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Kindig It Design, Inc. v. Creative Controls, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2016
- Giuffre v. MaxwellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.