Legal Opinion
Biro v. Condé Nast
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 9, 2012No. 11 Civ. 4442(JPO)PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
This is a diversity action for defamation and injurious falsehood. Plaintiff Peter *449Paul Biro was the subject of an article written by Defendant David Grann that appeared in the July 12-19, 2010 issue of the New Yorker magazine (the “Article”), published by Defendant Conde Nast, a division of Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. Biro alleges that the Article was false and defamatory in a variety of respects. Defendants Grann and Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. (“Advance”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss the Complaint…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Biro v. Condé NastCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Tannerite Sports, LLC v. NBCUniversal News GroupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- the Dallas Morning News, Inc. and Steve Blow v. John Tatum and Mary Ann TatumTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Stepanov v. Dow Jones & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.