Legal Opinion

Balfour & Garrette v. Worley

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1910No. Civ. No. 718PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. A. Hawkins, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an application on the part of the above-named corporation for its voluntary dissolution. The proceeding is authorized by the provisions of section 1227 to 1233, inclusive, of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Before the expiration of the time of the publication of the notice of said application as prescribed by section 1230 of said code, the contestant, T. C. Worley, filed objections to said application. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1231.) The ground upon which said opposition is interposed is that said corporation “is indebted to the said T. C. Worley in a sum exceeding $300 for commissions due…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Townsend v. HargravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State Inv. & Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Bird v. MunroeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Warder v. HutchisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API