Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Prusch

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1890No. 12738PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

This was an action to recover $1,160.75 as broker’s commissions for negotiating a sale of real property. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiffs, and the defendant appeals.

The evidence is not brought up, and the findings must therefore be taken to correctly set forth the facts of the case, which are as follows:—

The defendant authorized one Dunn, the assignor of the plaintiffs, to sell a tract of land then possessed and claimed by defendant, at a price not less than $23,125, and promised in writing that he “ should receive from defendant, as commissions for making such sale,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duffy v. HobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Armstrong v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Middleton v. FindlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Jauman v. McCusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Johnson v. KrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Bacon v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API