Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Kellogg
California Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1935No. Sac. 4901PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Jack M. Cooper, by his guardian ad litem, Maree Barbara Roberts, brings this action to recover damages for personal injuries received while riding as a guest with the defendant Beecher Kellogg, in a car belonging to the defendant Byrd W. Kellogg. Since the accident occurred on October 12, 1930, a finding of gross negligence upon the part of the driver will warrant a recovery by the guest under section 141% of the California Vehicle Act as in effect at that time. (Stotts v. Blickle, 220 Cal. 225 [30 Pac. (2d) 392].)
Jack Cooper left Santa Rosa with the defendant Beecher Kellogg, who was at that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Whiddon v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Blood v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Kastel v. StieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Ansback v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Bernosky v. GreffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.