Legal Opinion
Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Gotham Silk Hosiery Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 12, 1934No. 5073, 5089PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In the court below, Gotham Silk Hosiery Company, Inc., hereafter called “Gotham,” the owner of patent No. 1,824,636, granted September 32, 1931, to Roy E. Tilles for “Hosiery,” filed a bill charging the Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc., hereafter called “Artcraft,” with infringement thereof. In the same court, Gotham, the owner of patent No. 1,728,924, granted September 24, 1929', to Morris Buehsbaum for “Stockings,” filed a second bill against Artcraft, charging infringement of this latter patent. Both bills were heard together. After filial healing, the court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lehnbeuter v. HolthausSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1932
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oliver United Filters, Inc. v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Ostby & Barton Co. v. JungersenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1946
- Anderson Co. v. Trico Products Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.