Legal Opinion
Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 18, 1945No. 8287PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a recovery of profits to a patentee from an infringer. See 48 E.Supp. 131. The patent was held to be valid and infringed by the District Court of Delaware as reported in its opinion, 1 F.Supp. 643, affirmed, 3 Cir., 72 F.2d 47, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 595, 55 S.Ct. 109, 79 L.Ed. 688. On November 21, 1934, the case was referred to a Special Master for an accounting. 1 The plaintiff waived damages and sought to recover the profits which it alleged the defendant has received by reason of the infringement. On December 15, 1938, the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- The Haverhill Gazette Company v. Union Leader Corporation, Union Leader Corporation v. The Haverhill Gazette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Deering, Milliken & Co., Inc. v. Joseph Gilbert, Individually and Doing Business as Gilbert Textile CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Calhoun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.