Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
NIELDS, District Judge.
These patent suits were brought by Gotham Silk Hosiery Company, Inc., against Art-craft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. They were tried together. In one, plaintiff charges defendant with infringement of Tilles patent, No. 1,824,636, for “Hosiery.” In the other, plaintiff charges defendant with infringement of Buehsbaum patent, No. 1,728,924, for “Stocking.” The defense to the Tilles patent is invalidity by reason of (a) lack of patentable novelty, (b) anticipation, and (c) prior use by defendant. The defenses to the Buehsbaum patent are invalidity and noninfringement.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lehnbeuter v. HolthausSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
3Cited by8 opinions
- Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Gotham Silk Hosiery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Hazeltine Research v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1949
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Avco Manufacturing Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1954
- Radio Corp. v. Collins Radio Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.