Legal Opinion
Ostby & Barton Co. v. Jungersen
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 7, 1946No. 1438PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment instituted under section 274d of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400 and under the patent laws, and plaintiff seeks a declaration of invalidity and non-infringement of Jungersen Patent No. 2,118,468.
Defendant, Jungersen, the owner of the patent in suit, by counterclaim alleges infringement by plaintiff, Ostby & Barton, of the said patent and seeks an injunction and an accounting for infringement of claims 5 and 6 of his patent.
The original controversy between the parties was founded upon an accusation by the defendant that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Electric Cable Joint Co. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Textile MacHine Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jungersen v. BadenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Bechik Products, Inc. v. Flexible Products, Inc., a Corporation, and Morris Goldstein, Max Goldstein and Leo Goldstein, D/B/A Crown Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Jungersen v. BadenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- LD Schreiber Cheese Co., Inc. v. Clearfield Cheese Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.