Legal Opinion

Amin v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1991No. 90-109, 90-110PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellants, Abdullah Kru Amin and Donald Brian Calkins, appeal from their jury convictions for kidnapping and aggravated assault and battery in which their sentencing was enhanced by the effect of Wyoming’s habitual criminal statute.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellants raise these issues:

1.The trial court erred and abused its discretion when it failed to grant defendants’ motion for change of venue.

2. The trial court erred in excluding the testimony of Raymond Leidig, M.D. and refusing appellants’ jury instructions.

3. Appellants should be granted a new trial on the basis that they…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Scheikofsky v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. L.U. Sheep Co. v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. United States v. James Neal KinslowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Theodore W. Oswald v. Daniel BertrandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Yung v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Baier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API