Legal Opinion
Grandnorthern, Inc. v. West Mall Partnership
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 11, 1984No. C4-84-995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This is a dispute over the status of a commercial lease. Respondent-tenant claimed its lease remained effective having timely exercised its option to extend the lease for an additional five year term. Appellant, the landlord’s assignee, asserted the lease had expired and respondent was a holdover, month-to-month tenant. Finding no genuine issues of material fact, the trial court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment and declared its lease extended. We agree and affirm.
FACTS
On June 1, 1979, Grandnorthern, Inc. entered into a commercial lease agreement…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Patricia Ann Lundeen, General Guardian of Persons and Estates of Maureen Joan Cordner and Michael Joseph Cordner v. France Jeanne CordnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. ChilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Poplinski v. GislasonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. North Lakes Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Harter v. LenmarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988