Legal Opinion
Harter v. Lenmark
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 30, 1988No. C3-88-401PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.
Voigt 0. Lenmark and the estate of his deceased wife, Catherine S. Lenmark, appeal the trial court’s order for summary judgment, permitting respondent Elsie Harter to foreclose three junior mortgages made by the Lenmarks and to collect any deficiency due from the Lenmarks.
FACTS
Appellants Voigt 0. and Catherine S. Lenmark executed a series of mortgages on the same parcel of commercial real estate in St. Louis Park. On June Í5, 1984, the Lenmarks executed and delivered the first mortgage on the property, for $365,-000, to First Minnesota Savings Bank (then Minnesota…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Medtronic, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. S. Todd Gibbons, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Peterson v. MarstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- In Re the Brainerd National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Farmers Security State Bank of Zumbrota v. VoegeleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harter v. LenmarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989