Legal Opinion
Poplinski v. Gislason
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 16, 1986No. C7-86-1241PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This appeal is from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a legal malpractice action. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On September 2,1978, appellant Frederic Poplinski was involved in an automobile accident near Moorhead, Minnesota. Pop-linski was hospitalized following the accident and, according to his treating physician, suffered a 15 percent permanent partial impairment and a possible fracture of the cervical spine. Poplinski’s wife (Linda Sinotte) and Mr. and Mrs. George Kleinsch-midt, who were passengers in the automobile driven by Poplinski when the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Hoppe v. RanziniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Jonathan v. KvaalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Koderick v. Snyder Bros. Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Steinhilber v. Prairie Pine Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Goette v. Press Bar and Cafe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.