Legal Opinion
Ely v. Donoho
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
The defendants, Edmund S. Donoho, Jenifer Hoyt and Gerald’Farrelly, have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6) of the .Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
The complaint sets forth four separate causes of action. The first three are against the defendants, Edmund S. Donoho and Murray T. Donoho' for breach of contract. The fourth is in favor of the plaintiff, John T. A. Ely, against the defendants, Beaver, Hoyt and Farrelly for inducing the Donohos to breach their…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. VanderlipNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- O'Leary v. CurtisDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1941
- Bernard v. FrommeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- Agudo, Pineiro & Kates v. Harbert Const.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Tolliver v. MathasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. Quality PipelineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Driscoll's Towing Service, Inc. v. United States (In Re Driscoll's Towing Service, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1984
- Friedman v. SchneiderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.