Legal Opinion
Miller v. Vanderlip
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 6, 1941PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.
Upon this appeal the issue is whether the allegations of the complaint are sufficient to state a cause of action. We are not now concerned with the proof of the allegations or the proof of damages which must await a trial.
Two causes of action are alleged. The first for breach of contract, and the second apparently for conspiracy to breach the same contract. Since the second cause of action cannot stand if the first falls, we come to the allegations contained in the first cause of action. These are as follows:
Plaintiff, a man of considerable experience in' designing, manufacturing and selling…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- McQuade v. StonehamNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Brightman v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- North Shore Bottling Co. v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Albemarle Theatre, Inc. v. Bayberry Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Bereswill v. YablonNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Green v. DonigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Zwirn v. GalentoNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.