Tolliver v. Mathas
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Presiding Judge.
Marte Mathas sued Homer Tolliver, president and owner of Acutus Industries, and Acutus Industries of Michigan (hereinafter collectively, Acutus) for breach of two oral contracts. In one of these contracts, Acu-tus agreed to reimburse Mathas for funds *188he expended to gain control of certain shares of stock in T & M Manufacturing; in the other contract, Acutus agreed to reimburse Mathas for funds he expended to Keep T & M, a financially troubled company, operating. These contracts were made while T & M was under the jurisdiction of the bankruptey court for the Northern…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Brown v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Ross Clinic, Inc. v. TabionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Maddox v. YocumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Polk v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Sinn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Tolliver v. MathasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Debro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Thompson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.