Legal Opinion

Lane v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1986No. 20888PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Review of the Industrial Commission reversing a decision of the administrative law judge. The Board found that Randy M. Lane was discharged from his employment for just cause, thus disqualifying him from receiving benefits under the Employment Security Act. We conclude as a matter of law that “just cause” to discharge Lane did not exist.

For five years, Lane and his wife were employed by Telum, Inc., as co-assistant managers of a diesel fuel truck stop in Parowan, Utah. On April 5, 1985, Lane was cited by the Parowan City…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Clearfield City v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. Board of Review of Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Kehl v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Trotta v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pro-Benefit Staffing, Inc. v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Smith v. Workforce Appeals Board, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  3. Gibson v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. Grinnell v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Department of the Air Force v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API