Legal Opinion

Continental Oil Co. v. Board of Review of Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1977No. 14699PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice.

Plaintiff, Continental Oil Company, petitioned this court for review of an order of the Board of Review determining that Fred L. Forsyth was not ineligible for unemployment compensation. We affirm the decision of the Board of Review. All statutory references are to U.C.A.1953.

Forsyth was employed by plaintiff as a district sales representative from June 1968 until February 11,1976, when he was terminated solely for his driving record. Forsyth travelled approximately 25,000 miles per year in the conduct of his employer’s business. He was furnished a company automobile for this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Jacobs v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Barnum v. WilliamsNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Maywood Glass Co. v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Willard v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Yardville Supply Co. v. Board of Review, Dept. of LaborSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. West Jordan v. MorrisonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Clearfield City v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API