Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1996No. 1995-2554PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 509.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BOOHER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher,

1996-Ohio-248.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—One-year suspension—Court-appointed counsel for criminal defendant engaging in sexual activity with client in a jail meeting room. (No. 95-2554—Submitted March 19, 1996—Decided May 29, 1996.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 95-50. __________________ {¶ 1} On June 5, 1995 the relator, Office of Disciplinary Counsel,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BooherOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BunstineOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. OwenOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Bartels (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. HartkeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. TalikkaOhio Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API