Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Respondent, James R. Hartke, Attorney Registration No. 0011584, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1973. On February 14, 2011, relator, the Cincinnati Bar Association, filed a complaint charging Hartke with violations of Prof.Cond.R. 1.2(e) and 8.4(h). The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”) concluded that Hartke had violated the aforementioned rules and recommended that Hartke be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, with the entire suspension stayed. Hartke filed no objections. After reviewing the record, we hold that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BooherOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Counsel v. HeilandOhio Supreme Court · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Amaddio and Wargo (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Dayton Bar Assn. v. O'NealOhio Supreme Court · 2012