Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2013No. 2012-2049PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Edward Royal Bunstine of Chillicothe, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0030127, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1981.

{¶ 2} In a complaint filed on August 15, 2011, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Bunstine with professional misconduct for soliciting a client. The complaint alleged that Bunstine offered to make “other arrangements” for Ashley Holdren to pay his fee in a child-custody matter. During a meeting at his office, Bunstine told Holdren he would come to her home that afternoon and that she should answer the door naked. Holdren believed that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. StatzerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. WiseOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. HardimanOhio Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. SleibiOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. ParisOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BunstineOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. DuganOhio Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API