Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Talikka

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2013No. 2012-1324Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Talikka, 135 Ohio St.3d 323,

2013-Ohio-1012.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. TALIKKA. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Talikka, 135 Ohio St.3d 323,

2013-Ohio-1012.] Attorneys—Misconduct—Multiple violations involving multiple clients—Failure to return unearned fees—Failure to keep clients informed of status of case—Failure to keep client funds in separate account—Conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Two-year suspension, second year stayed on conditions. (No. 2012-1324—Submitted January 8, 2013—Decided March 20, 2013.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. AgopianOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API