Legal Opinion

Holmquist v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 23, 1987No. CX-86-2206PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant, Gerald Holmquist, brought suit against the State of Minnesota to recover for injuries he received in a motor vehicle accident allegedly caused by the State’s failure to warn of a dangerous condition on a highway. The trial court granted the State’s motion for summary judgment concluding that because the State had no notice of the dangerous condition, it had no duty to warn. On appeal, Holmquist argues that the trial court erred in its determination that because the State had no notice of a dangerous condition, it was entitled to discretionary immunity.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Cairl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Cook v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Ostendorf v. KenyonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Berg v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API