Drage v. Procter & Gamble
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Judge.
This case comes before the court on appeal from dismissal pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) of the amended complaint of plaintiff-appellant Elaine Drage in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas. Defendants-appellees in this case are Procter & Gamble (“P&G”) and six of its directors and three of its officers (“the defendant directors”): Edwin L. Artzt, Gordon F. Brunner, Gerald V. Dirvin, Durk I. Jager, Harald Einsmann, John E. Pepper, Erik G. Nelson, Edwin H. Eaton, Jr., and Raymond Mains. 1 Appellant filed a shareholder derivative action against P&G and the defendant…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. R.E. Roark Companies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Karcich v. StuartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re Ferro Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Davis v. DCB Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Carlson v. RabkinOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Keithley Instruments, Inc., Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.