Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Rabkin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 2003No. Appeal No. C-020477, Trial No. A-0106508PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, members and former members (we refer to all as “members” except where a distinction is relevant) of Save the Animals Foundation (“STAF”), appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their complaint against the defendants-appellees, directors of STAF and STAF itself. We conclude that three of the members’ five causes of action were properly dismissed. But we hold that because the members’ complaint stated a prima facie case for two of their claims, the members’ complaint should not have been dismissed in its entirety. We therefore reverse the trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Adair v. WozniakOhio Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Ferro Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. In Re Keithley Instruments, Inc., Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Kakde (In Re Kakde)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  5. Smith v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API