Legal Opinion

Baker v. State Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1929No. 20034PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, C.

The only question presented by the record in this ease is whether the injury sustained by the claimant, French Baker, arose out of his employment wiithin the meaning of the Workman’s Compensation Law of this state. The State Industrial Commission denied his claim for compensation, and he brought action in this court to review the finding and judgment of the Commission.

The claimant was an employee of E. G. Fuqua, whose place of business was at Al-tus, Okla. Fuqua had the district agency covering four counties, for the sale of a refrigerating device called a “Frigidaire.” One of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Merrill v. Penasco Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Socha v. Cudahy Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Gale v. Krug Park Amusement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API