Legal Opinion

Gale v. Krug Park Amusement Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1926No. 25172PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This action was instituted by Eliza N. Gale, widow of Charles S. Gale, deceased, hereinafter called plaintiff, against the Krug Park Amusement Company, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, before the compensation commissioner, to recover compensation in the sum of $15 a week for 350 weeks, beginning on the 3d day of June, 1925, and hospital and burial expenses, together with attorney’s fees. The.issues were duly joined, and trial had before the commissioner, and the claim allowed and ordered paid as prayed. An appeal was taken by the defendant to the district court for Douglas county,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Industrial Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  5. Socha v. Cudahy Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Louie v. Bamboo GardensIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Slanina v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Netherton v. Lightning Delivery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API