Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Dvorak

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1998No. Civil 970341PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] The Disciplinary Board petitions for reciprocal discipline under North Dakota Rules for Lawyer Discipline (NDRLD) 4.4, recommending discipline identical to that imposed by the Minnesota Supreme Court be imposed on Shirley A. Dvorak. See In re Disciplinary Action Against Dvorak, 554 N.W.2d 399 (Minn.1996). We accept the Board’s recommendation and impose the identical discipline.

I

[¶ 2] Dvorak was admitted to practice law in North Dakota in 1976 and has spent her entire professional career with the Moos-brugger, Dvorak & Carter law firm in Grand Forks. She was also admitted to practice in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Johnson v. FankellSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. PalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re the Application for Disciplinary Action Against DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Renault v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Disciplinary Action Against DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API