Legal Opinion
LaValle v. Kulkay
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 30, 1979No. 48307PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Plaintiffs 1 initiated this action for in-junctive relief against defendants George and Faye Kulkay, seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant in their deeds by permanently enjoining defendants from renting the basement of their residence to persons not members of their family. Defendants counterclaimed against plaintiffs Lloyd M. LaValle and Margaret A. LaValle, seeking damages allegedly caused by the LaValles’ placement of an in-ground swimming pool in violation of setback restrictions established in the Carver County zoning ordinance.
The trial court found that Alfred W.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Theros v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Strauss v. GinzbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Rose v. Kenneseth Israel CongregationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
3Cited by11 opinions
- Minneapolis Public Housing Authority v. LorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Bubolz v. Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Upper Midwest Sales Co. v. Ecolab, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Bieter Co. v. BlomquistDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Dege v. City of MaplewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.