Legal Opinion

Dege v. City of Maplewood

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1987No. C9-87-1574PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

The City of Maplewood appeals from summary judgment granted to Dege. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Albert and George Dege own Dege Garden Center in Maplewood. In 1971, Albert Dege obtained a special use permit from the city in order to construct a parking lot adjacent to the garden center, on land zoned for residential use. The special use permit allowed customer parking but prohibited truck or trailer storage in the park-mg lot. The special use permit also required a public hearing prior to any modification of its terms.

In 1986, George Dege obtained a building permit from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Pelser v. GingoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Hawkinson v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rice Street VFW, Post 3877 v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  2. City of North Oaks v. SarpalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club v. City of ShorewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. White v. City of Elk RiverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API