Legal Opinion
Minneapolis Public Housing Authority v. Lor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 8, 1999No. C2-97-1756PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Appellant Minneapolis Public Housing Authority (MPHA) contends that when a public housing authority brings an unlawful detain-er action against one of its tenants on the basis of alleged criminal activity by a household member, trial courts may not consider facts other than whether the tenant actually violated the lease. As the trial court considered the hardship respondent tenant Mai Lor would face in finding a new apartment, MPHA claims that the trial court reached beyond its powers in ruling for Lor. We conclude that the trial court has the power to review…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. Lorraine Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. HangslebenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Flynn v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Memphis Housing Authority v. ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.