Legal Opinion

Katz v. Helbing

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12445PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants entered after defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint has been sustained without leave to amend.

The complaint which the court below held did not state a cause of action sets forth the following facts: All defendants except defendant A. G. Isaacs were members of a copartnership engaged in the building contracting business in the city and county of San Francisco, and were the owners of certain real property in said city and county. Said defendants and defendant A. G. Isaacs, on August 25, 1925, were, and for several weeks prior…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Cole v. German Savings & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Hartnett v. Boston StoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Horan v. Inhabitants of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Gibson v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Sawyer v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Copfer v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Lacy v. Pacific Gas Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1934

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API