Legal Opinion

Nash v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1935No. 3178PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in this court by J. A. Nash and wife, Hattie Nash, as re-lators, against Hanover Fire Insurance Company, J. E. South, Honorable W. M. Taylor, judge of the 14th district court, Honorable Claude M. MeCallum, judge of the 101st district court, Floyd West and F. H. Duff, composing the firm of Floyd West & Co., general agents of said insurance company, and the St. Paul Mercury & Indemnity Company, as respondents.

Mrs. Nash and husband obtained a judgment in the 14th district court against said insurance company in a suit upop a fire insurance policy,v…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Halbrook v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Browning-Ferris MacHinery Co. v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. NashCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Texas Nat. Bank v. ZellersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Nash v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Meissner v. FuchsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Jackson v. BirkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Snelson v. DraneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Chapman v. De BogoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API