Legal Opinion

Nash v. McCallum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 4, 1934No. 3161PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in this court brought by Hattie Nash and husband against the Honorable Claude M. McOallum, judge of the 101st district court of Dallas county, the Hanover Fire Insurance Company, and J. E. South.

The relators heretofore sued the said Insurance Company in the district court of Dallas county to recover the amount due upon a fire insurance policy covering a house. South attempted to intervene in that suit and was denied the right so to do. On November 9, 1932, relators obtained a judgment for the amount due upon the policy. The Insurance Company…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sterling v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hovey v. ShepherdTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Conley v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  4. City of Houston v. City of PalestineTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  5. City of Palestine v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Nash v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Farmers State Bank of Meridian v. National Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. National Surety Corp. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Jackson v. BirkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API