Legal Opinion

Chapman v. De Bogory

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1935No. 12036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

This is an original proceeding by E. X. Chapman, S. J. Taylor and E. L. Evans, relators, complaining of Eugene De Bo-gory, trustee, Claude Morgan, George W. Harwood, clerk of the district court, Dallas county, Tex., and E. R. Tennant, receiver in the cause No. 89811 — B, styled Atkins et al. v. Joiner, pending in the Forty-fourth district court of Dallas county, respondents.. The controversy arose as follows: On September 22, 1934, we affirmed a judgment of the district court in favor of re-lators against Morgan and De Bogory, trustee, in a contest over the ownership of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Browning-Ferris MacHinery Co. v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Nash v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Maxwell's Unknown Heirs v. BoldingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. State Trust & Savings Bank v. Ferguson Seed Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. De Bogory v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunt Production Co. v. BurrageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Martin v. City of CorsicanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API